Ending the ban on general solicitation for companies seeking investment from accredited investors will result in many angels refusing to participate in this type of investing, according to the Angel Capital Association (ACA).
Under the JOBS Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission was tasked with lifting the ban on general solicitation for issuers privately raising capital under Regulation D Rule 506(c), provided that issuers take “reasonable steps to verify” that all investors are accredited.
In final rules published last week, the SEC provided a convoluted, “principles-based approach,” along with several “safe harbors” that issuers may use. Safe harbors include: “reviewing pay stubs for the two most recent years and current year;” or “reviewing copies of any IRS form that reports income,” (including Form W-2, Form 1099 or a copy of filed Form 1040).
For married accredited investors, the rule specifies that both spouses would have to divulge such information to an issuer. Alternatively, a safe harbor would occur if the investor submits a certified statement from a third party such as an “attorney, accountant or registered investment advisor,” provided that the third party could establish that it had also undertaken “reasonable steps to verify” that an investor was accredited. Third party verification would need to be updated every three months.
The current SEC definition of accredited investor for a natural person is an individual with annual income exceeding $200,000 and/or net worth greater than $1 million excluding the value of a primary residence. For a married couple, the income test increases to $350,000. Under Dodd-Frank legislation, this definition will be revisited in the coming year, and a General Accounting Office study is expected to be released within a week with recommendations that could substantially raise qualifying amounts.
“Angel investors provide the fundamental source of start-up capital in our economy,” Hudson said. “Not a single angel I have spoken with is willing to provide personal financial information to an issuer who is asking them for investment. This violation of privacy is untenable, especially for the angels who do multiple deals a year. If an issuer has information on total net worth or income of an investor, that provides vast information asymmetry. This would be like having your bank demand to know your net worth before you could open a bank account to put money in, or the stock market demanding to know your net income before you can trade securities.”
“These SEC rules provide no safe harbor for our angel members, which effectively could kill most angel investment in this country,” said David Verrill, board chairman of ACA. “Our member angel groups have decades of history investing in startups while self-certifying their accredited status without one single iota of fraud. Our process works because angel groups know their members well, and focus on the education and skill needed to do this type of investing well. Angels do not have to invest in start-ups, but we are almost entirely the only ones who do so – some 90% of outside equity raised by start-ups comes from angel ranks.”
“It would be devastating for the economy if innovative startups that create all net new jobs in the US lose access to this critical capital,” Verrill said. “Congress passed the JOBS Acts as a way for small businesses to access more capital and therefore create more jobs. Unfortunately, these rules appear to do the opposite.”