Clout vs. Klout: Why the Latter Doesn’t Measure True Influence

While some employers will check a prospective employee’s digital influence, it should not blow one’s chances of getting a job

In a world where we are inundated with information, brands are always looking for efficient ways to cut through the clutter and identify influencers and tastemakers. In fact, the San Francisco-based social media analytics company Klout provides a service that can do so with the click of a button.

On a scale from 1 to 100, Klout—a measurement of your digital influence based upon your true reach (number of people you influence), amplification (how much you influence your digital network) and network impact (the influence of your network) aggregated from your social networks—generates a figure for social media users. The algorithm measures your activity on up to 12 different social media profiles. Yes, all those status updates, “likes,” replies, retweets and comments count towards your overall score.

But, can a single number truly be the tipping point in identifying an elite group of individuals that companies and brands want? Should your Klout score—the FICO Score for your online activity— be the absolute measure of your influence?

I beg to differ. If you take a closer look at the social media measurement tool, it’s flawed. It should not be looked at as the single indicator for evaluating absolute influence. For one, it doesn’t include offline influence.  It also doesn’t measure your online activity holistically.

Recently, across the web, people have been chatting about whether or not employers should reference one’s Klout score during the interview process. If your career has nothing to do with social media and online marketing, why should you have to maintain (or even know) about Klout?  I would question any employer making a hiring decision and spending thousands of dollars to train and take on new employees solely based upon their Klout score. That would be a risky and very costly proposition. When it comes to the employment process, various factors come into play such as experience, character, and skill set, among other things.  Klout cannot be used as the only tool measuring a person’s qualifications:

Klout Doesn’t Measure Offline Influence— Currently, Klout does not measure your real-world impact or the relationships you’ve garnered offline. The influence measurement tool determines your network score after drawing data from Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google+, Foursquare, YouTube and other social networking platforms. Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates has a Klout score of 77 while Snooki of Jersey Shores has a Klout score of 87. According to Klout, Snooki is more of an influencer than Bill Gates. You be the judge of that one!

It’s All a Game— With some persistence—and a little dedication, you can increase your Klout score significantly. But recruiters and employers should note that isn’t saying anything about an individual’s overall influence, network and the like. Just because you can get an influencer to tweet back and forth with you for a few, doesn’t mean you have actually established a meaningful (or long-lasting) relationship. What are you doing to maintain a relationship with that contact once the Twitter chat is over? It’s those well-established relationships that are going to take your network somewhere.

While there is value in the data Klout generates, users—and non-users alike—must choose how important their network score is to their overall social capital, as well as if it’s even relevant to their career or industry.

ACROSS THE WEB
  • Ira Naluegrom

    Sad to say my friend but Klout has it right – Snooki does influence more people than Bill Gates – Does Bill have a TV show watched by millions every week? Klout has their game on tight – gates has a big influence – but on a small circle

  • Shawn P Williams

    In now way should Klout scores be used as anything more than an isolated piece of information. If someone wants to take it into account as one of many factors in measuring one’s influence, I’m O.K. with that. I look at the number on Empire Avenue as an even more accurate predictor. But as Hajj says, the offline successes of online people can’t be underestimated.

  • Charles @mrmusicismylife McCree

    Just read your article on Clout VS Klout and I have to say that 1st yes Snooki does have a bigger influence then Bill Gates. Why? its her platform and her “true reach” more people in this day in time know who she is and are more interested in what she is doing then Bill Gates. I am head of social media & digital content for a major record label and these are the conversation that I have everyday. Klout.com finally allows the one thing that all people believe in (even when they don’t want to) and that’s numbers to be shown to all the nay sayers and non believers that certain people have way more influence then others. Companies and brands (well some of them) are finally understanding that it is more “cost effective” to pay a person with a high twitter following a fee to tweet about their products verses advertising the traditional way. I don’t believe that a person Klout score should be the only deciding factor when hiring, BUT it definitely should rank very high in the decision factor. In the words of Sean Jay-Z Carter “Men lie… Women Lie… But Numbers —> (Klout)don’t.

  • Pingback: Fluencr Rewards Users for Promoting Brands